ASCIIDOC Support?

[narand]

+1 for Asciidoc support from me as well

[cwensel]

+1 on asciidoc

[Ouyang_Obsidian]

+1 for Asciidoc support

[downbad]

Why not reStructuredText?

It’s used by the Linux Kernel, has the same benefits as AsciiDoc but a much better syntactic and semantic foundation.

I think RST is the future due to how expressive, standardized (including the tooling) and well documented it is, but having all three major light markup languages (MD, AD and RST) would be ideal.

In any case, I agree that Markdown is just straight up bad.

[fin]

+1 for asciidoc support

[Dor]

@downbad

I agree that Markdown is just straight up bad

Wouldn’t argue with that

@downbad

I think RST is the future due to how expressive, standardized (including the tooling) and well documented it is, but having all three major light markup languages (MD, AD and RST) would be ideal.

Org is probably best. And already a Logseq option.

[softsapiens]

+1 for asciidoc support

[victor4u]

+1 for asciidoc. All the arguments are already mentioned. Markdown is useful but very limited to small documents. But I also understand that Markdown is very much built in Oblivion making asciidoc alternative to a major extension and complex it for many users who do not work with asciidoc. Another way of integration would be a plugin that make it easy to convert a directory/selection/or-all-links-from-a-note and generate a snapshot asciidoc document with back-references (maybe again links into obsidian) and thus enable a to and fro approach. This could be very practical for the people starting on articles or books with a zettelkasten or similar approach.