I will show several specific scenarios below to present Obsidian’s current actual results. The expected results are indicated in the same-line comment.
> 1. item 1
> 2. item 2
>
> some text
>
> 3. new item 1 // Hope the index here is 1 but it can't be
Scenario 2, OP: Obsidian Chinese Forum t48455 (Solved in 1.8.10)
> 1. item 1
> 2. indent item 1 // Hope the index here is 1
3. item outside // Hope the index here is 1
Tracking: #4 for 1.8.10. (The scenario 2.1 mentioned in #5 comes from here)
Environment
SYSTEM INFO:
Obsidian version: v1.8.9
Installer version: v1.8.9
Operating system: Windows 11 Home China 10.0.22631
Login status: not logged in
Language: zh
Insider build toggle: off
Live preview: on
Base theme: light
Community theme: none
Snippets enabled: 0
Restricted mode: off
Plugins installed: 0
Plugins enabled: 0
@GLight Yeah I posted it in the second place of Additional information as well before.
Let me add a little more. The analysis provided by the original poster of that post may not correspond to this issue, cause this kind of format has always been just a list.
1. item 1
2. item 2
1. item // can't be. It's in the same list so must be 3.
But a blockquote is a separate block, which differs from this. Since the bug reported by the poster and the analysis look like 2 different cases, I’m not sure which one the “would fix” in the official reply referred to. For Obsidian, the former is an issue, while the latter is more like a manifestation of the basic Markdown syntax. Still, thank you for actively providing suggestions.
1. before block item 1
> 1. item
2. after block item 1 // Hope the index here is 1
Environment
SYSTEM INFO:
Obsidian version: v1.8.10
Installer version: v1.8.9
Operating system: Windows 11 Home China 10.0.22631
Login status: logged in
Language: zh
Catalyst license: insider
Insider build toggle: off
Live preview: on
Base theme: light
Community theme: none
Snippets enabled: 0
Restricted mode: off
Plugins installed: 0
Plugins enabled: 0
@WhiteNoise Thank you. Previously, there were users continuously posting similar threads on the Chinese forum, so I created a summary post. At that time, I also suggested that they should report on the English forum in the future. I may not actively follow up on the subsequent situation. Out of a sense of responsibility, I will stop doing it on their behalf for now. Thank you again for your reply.