Use case or problem
The setting in Files and links > Advanced > Excluded file causes two problems to a lot of members in the community:
- It’s confusing. Even though the setting’s description is there and the documentation is clear, people keep asking about misconceptions from time to time.
- It’s a feature we miss. Lots of us would love to have a ignore setting, for several reasons.
Proposed solution
The easy solution we could deploy in the next release (at time this is accepted): Rename this setting to “Faded files”. The current description reads: “Ignored files will be hidden in Search, … less noticeable in Quick Switcher…“, so this new name seems to better fit.
I think this greatly reduce the expectations “we” have from this setting, and will help reducing the amount of questions, and the amount of frustration towards how this behaves. It’s a simple label update.
Later on, a second step would be to introduce a “Ignored files” setting.
Ignored file would be not indexed, not read on vault opening, not anything. Obsidian just bypass them. Until the file is embedded, or read by a plugin.
However, as discussed below, there’s already an existing FR for this, so most of the content from here is actually redirected to a comment there!
Current workaround
None.
What gets solved & Related feature requests
It gets us ride of the confusions and assumptions around the Excluded files term.
- /t/ignored-folder-not-really-ignored/47542
- Number of Discord messages. “I thought excluding a folder would”
If you have other good reasons, related FR, or want to suggest an edit to this post, please comment here or ping me on Discord (DM accepted).