I’ve got years of daily journals in Emacs org-mode. I filtered out some ideas, put it in an ACE system, and got a graph like this. Now it looks cool, but I’m not getting any ideas from looking at this. Am I doing something wrong? How should I be thinking about links and ideas to find graph useful?
Case in point: I found Gall’s Law “Structure Must Be Earned” very profound and familiar.
But I can’t imagine where to connect it to here. It’s not a 1st tier fundamental truth, it probably comes out of something. Which means there are 2nd tier fundamental truths…
Graphs have several levels of usefulness. The very basic levels are well supported by Obsidian’s Graph:
- Discover orphans. What notes aren’t linked at all? They might need some attention.
- Discover isolated clusters. Why aren’t they linked to other notes? Is there a good reason?
The most useful level is not supported by Obsidian’s Graph:
- Show only certain kinds of links. This would encourage building ontologies.
Linking is about making knowledge explicit. A bold statement like “If you just want things to work, the fun is gone” needs some context and explanation. f this statement is a quote, I’d link to the source of the quote. If it’s my original thought, I would mention what prompted it. If it’s a research question, I would link it to at least one general area like “work ethics”, “motivation”, “pragmatism” etc.
Obsidian makes this kind of linking really easy with [[wiki-links]] and core plugins like Backlinks and Outgoing links.
But in order to see connections in the graph, you have to first create links in the notes.
And don’t underestimate #tags. I think of them as “linking for the not so diligent”.
If links and tags are too much work, then at least group your notes in some folder. A folder is form of implicit linking. Moving isolated notes to an “Inbox” makes one important connection visible: you didn’t really think about them yet.
I am firmly of the belief that no technology will fully replace the need to know many facts about a topic/field and spend hours pondering about a problem. Global graph view is useful for getting a sense of the “shape” of the entire vault and local graph view is useful for finding 2-hop links, and that’s about it.
