I want something that does that and only that, maybe a simplified thing breadcrumbs is trying to do where you can set relationships between one or two names
Also, why every plugin wants to do everything, why do i need excalidraw and dataview to merely use excalibrain? Why breadcrumbs and juggl don’t work? I just want to use this to see the relationships between notes and nothing does it right, i would try making this myself but i have no code experience and am mentally exhausted from school
Really, i am kinda pissed that people try to put everything into a plugin instead of making multiple, it is more work but it doesn’t gwt bloated with features
This is an excellent idea, as it will allow for Semantic Links and not just regular links. This will help move Obsidian towards a comprehensive ontology.
“Also, why every plugin wants to do everything”?
There’s like 2000 plugins at this point. Most of the good ones either follow closely with the Unix Philosophy, or are so opinionated they change entire workflows and how you use the app (e.g. make.md)
“Why breadcrumbs and juggl don’t work?”
They were made by different people, probably at different points in time. You can’t really expect all plugins to work seamlessly with one another, or intentionally write code that is compatible with a future plugin they do not know exists yet.
“why do i need excalidraw and dataview to merely use excalibrain?”
Dataview is treated as a dependency plugin. I don’t think the creator of Excalidraw wants to rewrite their own potentially incompatible version of Dataview just for excalibrain.
But yes, semantic links would be nice although I don’t see myself using them that often.
fair, but before it was said that juggl was tightly made with breadcrumbs in mind, or vice versa, and i know, logically, that people don’t work in the ideas word, but emotionally i just get frustrated that people don’t just make one plugin do one thing, thank you for your explanation
i just want to see the type of links i made in graph view, i am not sure how i would do that code wise, specially in the edge case of seeing one or the other first in a bidirectional relationship, so if you are in full graph view, should it say “up” or “down”, of course, if you rover over one note it should say that notes relationship with others and not the other way around, and there is also the edge case of if something is linked in two different relationships, so if noteA is linked to noteB with “up” but noteB to noteA is “next”
idk, i am just kinda frustrated
