Since updating to v1.8.4 from 1.8.0, in Live Preview Mode (the only mode I really have ever used in my 2 1/2 years of Obsidian usage), once changing the numbering of a numbered list, Obsidian now automatically changes all descending numbered lists (except those separated by a --- ) to match the numbering of the changed, higher positioned list.
In addition, it is no longer possible to manually enter a list as such:
^ The second value, entered as a 1. would have remained as a 1., but now appears as a 2. and can’t be changed manually to a 1..
SYSTEM INFO:
Obsidian version: v1.8.4
Installer version: v1.8.4
Operating system: Windows 10 Pro 10.0.19045
Login status: not logged in
Language: en
Insider build toggle: off
Live preview: on
Base theme: adapt to system
Community theme: none
Snippets enabled: 0
Restricted mode: off
Plugins installed: 0
Plugins enabled: 0
If this somehow is not a new bug, but a feature, I sincerely ask for the option to turn this new automatic numbering off and/or for it to affect only lists not separated by a single line or more as this severely affects my workflow because I regularly prefer to write long notes organized into headings, and I regularly keep separate numbered lists within a single note, whose numbering I occasionally update as needed (which, as is, then would ruin the numbering off all descending lists).
If my understanding that the feature/bug linked in that other post is the same as my problem, then presumably this will be fixed in the upcoming 1.8.5 update, as the solution of that post states.
What you are showing in your example is just one list. There’s no text between the two series (only one blank line), according to markdown that’s one single list.
The other BR you linked is for two separate lists and will be fixed in 1.8.5
I’m aware there was auto-incrementation for single lists before, but I meant to show two separate lists with separate incrementation are no longer possible in a place they were before.
Anyway, the actual problem seems like it will be fixed anyway, so thanks for that.
This example is clearly 2 separate lists, correct? This is what I meant to show in my original example (since this is how separate lists were organized in my notes before).