afaics a web version of Obsidian would require a web database. Obsidian Sync already stores vaults online. idk but I would assume that a web version of Obsidian would require quite a bit of extra development. In which case, it seems to me that the earliest it could be done would be well into next year, and even that would assume it was the next major priority target after Live Preview. And pricing-wise it would be Sync+
A quicker, but much less complete and convenient alternative, would be to:
- sync attachments to a cloud drive
- export the vaults to OPML and import the OPML into Dynalist
- use the web version of Dynalist
- export the OPML from Dynalist and import into Obsidian.
Biggest issue is that Dynalist isn’t set up for importing multiple small files which is the reason to use OPML. But reducing a vault to a small number of files then requires using longform markdown files rather than the atomic notes in a single file that is the norm for many Obsidian users. The same amount of information/text is possible but in fewer files and retaining all the ability to link. It effectively uses headers instead of file names. OPML retains all the hierarchies in the markdown files.
A simple way of facilitating management of attachments would be with a simple nesting approach:
- Folder A contains Folder B and Folder C
- Folders A and B are vaults; Folder C is the attachment folder for Vault A
- The export/import/web use is all done with Vault B
- Folder C is synced with a cloud drive and therefore accessible from the web
- Vault A is what is used when not restricted to web use
With less convenience, Folder B could be uploaded to a cloud drive and the files could be read and edited. But linking and search would not be as easy as with the Dynalist option.