Graph View Arrows

Would love for a option to have the arrows pointing the other way around, if possible…

1 Like

I would really appreciate this option as well.

1 Like

I currently have the same problem. I can understand why they did so, but out of a other perspective it is better on a other way.

My personal workaround is a python script but it is difficult and not available for everyone.

My personal proposal would just be a option if you wanna connect from the second file to first or from first to second. Sometimes it is more easy from bottom to the top.

I think the obsidian coder had the following perspective: If I writing a file there could be moments where they thought:,a animal is something like a [[dog]], a [[bear||, a [[eagle]], a [[cat]]", so they would build there vault. And show the flow of creating doc’s.

My perspective.
I would like to use the graph view as a tool to visualize connections between topics.
So if I thinking about my study program and wanna build up a library of chains of how I deal with problems like calculating geometry. I think:, to calculate a angle of a triangle I need two sides of a triangle. So my way of writing would look like.

triangle → two sides → trigonometry → a angle
→ a good tool → measure by hand

every file I would wrote after each other. Otherwise my thinking would look like.
I have a triangle. Which values can I get out of it or which problems could I get?
But I probably would rather think, I search for a angle, with which tools I could solve that problem? Oh yeah, trigonometry, then I would like to connect to trigonometry directly in this file instead of going into the triangle file and connecting it with trigonometry. After that i would ask what do I need for this. I would need two sides. Then I would have to reconnect from triangle to two sides to trigonometry. Better would be if I could just start from the ending to connecting upwards. Later I would noticing that I also could measure by hand. Than I could go to “a angle” and connecting a other requirement.
If I would do it on the obsidian way, I would have to now that branch from the top to the bottom but…

Because I cant editing my previous post, which was 20 minutes ago.

  • My personal thinking is going from problem to solution and at the end I connect to problem-solution flow to his category. And not have the category than the solution an after that the problem.

You know could say why not on this way. Because if I would have other problem which is following on the first problem, the chain would look really messy