Deeply nested lists always render failure!

[Chay]

Source

2. **separation:** 自由组合中，verb 和 adverb 之间常常可以插入一个 modifying adverb $right$(or sometimes $straight$); 这种插入在 phrasal verb 中具有不同程度的不可接受性
3. **inversion:** 
    1. 由组合中，可以将 adverb 置于 主-动倒装结构前面(主语是代词的时候不进行倒装)<sub>即: 可以将 adverb 置于主动倒装结构或者代动结构前面</sub>; 
        - `Out` `came` the sun.
        - `Up` you came.
        - `On` we `drove` into the night.
    2. Phrasal Verb 一般不可以. 例外:
        - Some examples are more acceptable if the particle is reduplicated according to the pattern of iterative coordination:
            - $on$ and $on$ he $went$ about his wife and  family.
        - 如果 adverb-particle 使用的是其 metaphorical use, 倒装又是quite acceptable:
            - $Down\ came$ the prices, and $up\ went$ the sales.
            - There was a gust of wind, and $out\ went$ the light.

result

Environment

version: 1.9.14

---

Additional information

[Chay]

result:

and what’s more, the nested quote block > in the list can’t be toggled.

[WhiteNoise]

I don’t understand this BR.

[CawlinTeffid]

Did you follow the Troubleshooting Guide as the bug report template said to do?

The closing code block markers were missing in the original post. I edited it post to add them.

I see this in my test vault: