Use case or problem
I organize my vault using a meaningful folder hierarchy (e.g., /Projects/AI Ethics/, /Areas/Psychology/Cognition/). When I place a note inside a folder, I’m expressing a semantic relationship: “this note belongs to this category or domain.”
However, this intentional structure is invisible in Graph View. The graph only shows [[wikilinks]] and tags — not the folder-based relationships I’ve carefully built. This creates a disconnect: my physical organization (folders) and semantic network (graph) don’t align, making the graph feel incomplete or misleading.
I want Graph View to reflect the full spectrum of how I relate ideas — including the humble, powerful act of placing a note in a folder.
Proposed solution
Add an optional toggle in Graph View Settings:
Show folder hierarchy as relationships
Style: Dashed line +icon (e.g.,
note.md —📁→ FolderName)
Optional: Limit depth / Filter by path / Exclude certain folders
This would visualize:
note.md → parent folderparent folder → grandparent folder(optional)
Example:
Attention.md → (
) → Cognition → (
) → Psychology
This feature should be off by default to avoid overwhelming new users. Power users can enable it to enrich their graph with structural context.
Current workaround (optional)
I currently use a Python script to manually insert folder relationships into note frontmatter:
---
belongs: "[[Cognition]]"
---
This works, but it’s static — if I move the file, I must rerun the script. It’s a brittle, manual hack for something that should be native.
Plugins like “Folder Notes” or “ExcaliBrain” do not solve this — they serve different purposes (clickable folders / canvas-based mind maps).
Related feature requests (optional)
- Allow [[links]] to folders (2020) — Related, but focuses on linking, not graph visualization.
- Folders and Links, Hierarchy vs Flat Structure — Discusses folder vs link philosophy, but doesn’t request graph integration.