Hi everyone,
Here’s my thought process for this:
Some tag features:
- Tags are a shortcut to a search function, but this function is limited. I cannot use regex with them (for example
tag:/^#string/
), such as tags starting with something or ending with something. In this specific sense, a tag is inferior to a normal search. - Tags are weak links between concepts, as there is not a specific page to tie the two concepts together. Sometimes you just want to relate two or more things without creating a page. We should keep that.
- Tags have a dedicated panel
- Tags look different in the document
Today I was wondering, should my dates be tags or notes to link to? The concept of daily notes calls for the later, but there are cases where I just want to tag something with a date as to not create a page. So right now I feel like I should be using both tags and notes for my dates, and tags only for when I don’t need the page.
So, a realization came to mind, a link [[]]
can become a tag if Obsidian makes three changes:
- A key combination, something like
Alt + Click
that when pressed instead of going to the page, it becomes a search function such as"[[string]]"
. - An option in the configuration to ask before creating a page with a link click, in case the page does not exist before. This has to be paired with a visual signal to differentiate which links have pages created and which ones don’t. There are many options here, color, adding a pound symbol at the start of the link like
#[[string]]
, etc. - A way to save searches and/or to have links be listed in a separated panel. Similarly to the tag pane.
These three things would make the concept of links [[]]
contain the concept of tags #
with the added benefit that there would not be restrictions for multi-word tags (no needed to join with -
,_
, etc.)
Another plus is that there would not be an unnecessary worry if a concept should be a link or a tag, as the link would serve both.
The big con here is that there would be two competing features that overlap with the same use-cases, making things confusing for the users. So there should be a clear path of implementation paired with an option for users to massively reformat notes, in case this comes to fruition (similar to the markdown importer).
Thoughts?