Hi everyone!
I’m starting my PKM journey. After watching @tallguyjenks video about the use of tags and links (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIh1S7ra3aI), it resonated a lot with me. I prefer organic structures to pre-made rigid ones. Now my doubt is…
Are there any best practices (specially with that use of links as tags) for categorization? Let’s put an example. Say I have a note about something related to “JavaScript”. In my mind its categories (links) could be:
- Single link to “Computer/Programming/JavaScript” MOC (hierarchical).
- Links to “JavaScript”, “Programming”, “Computer” MOCs (no strict hierarchy but links to all upward "chain).
- Links to just the “JavaScript” MOC where that MOC links up to “Programming” MOC which links up to “Computer” MOC.
All in all, I’m trying to avoid pitfalls to the growth of my Knowledge base and emergence/discoverablity but I don’t have a clear notion on whether it is better to:
- Have strict hierarchical subcategories (in theory “JavaScript” should always be a child of “Programming” but you never know) or…
- If its better to keep it flat but link to all related topics even if they are “far away” or…
- Link to just the most concrete topic which would then be linked/related to its parent topic but can also be linked to other topics (IDK, maybe I have a MOC about “sorting algorithms” or “AI” which that note can be related too).
I think I haven’t expressed this well but I find it hard to explain. Any insights and experiences are really welcome.
Thanks a lot!