Steps to reproduce
Test 3^[>[!info]- TITLE HERE
testing
testing 2
]
This should be legit syntax. Please!!!
Inline footnotes are much better than typical footnotes, because they stay stuck to your block.
If its a normal footnote, when you move stuff, via note composer etc., there is a high chance the footnote definition doesn’t get moved with it.
This will create a problem where the footnote number of the new note, will replace the footnote of the paragraph you merged with.
The solution to this is just to accept multiple lines for inline footnotes i.e.
This is content^[this is all my footnote information
I can create multiple lines, and then
enclose it with a bracket at the
end
]
Now no matter where that paragraph goes, the footnote remains the same, because its being defined inline.
It works as of now, but the last bracket isn’t highlighted, so it makes me think its not legit syntax.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE
DONT PATCH THIS.
Embrace it!
Its much much much better than the native way of doing footnotes, where you have to define the number at the bottom.
And its not hurting anyone… I beg you, all my notes use inline already, because it genuinely is superior…