I have started to use aliases and I am not completely satisfied with the fact that links replace automatically the alias by the filename of the note. Is there any technical reason for not keeping the alias?
: I am planning to write notes on articles and I would like to name the file with a pattern “Authors - Year - Title” because it’s nicer (and can in principle be used by other applications, for example a bibliography management). Most paper have a unique ID (arxiv, doi…) which I am using as an alias. It’s common practice to cite a paper with its ID only, which is short and clear. The automatic replacement creates huge links which make the notes less readable. Finally, it’s not a good strategy to name files with the ID because they often contain bad characters for filenames (dots, slashes…).