Simply comparing a free app with subscription incentives that many people don’t pay for (i.e. sync) to a product like Tana (or more likely Coda) that restricts free usage to incentivize payment. I’m not at all saying Obsidian doesn’t make money, nor am I suggesting that they should start charging more money; I’m just making an observation as to why Tana/Coda/Notion will stay further ahead feature-wise, as their business model supports rapid development and feature releases in comparison. If Obsidian makes a similar amount of money to those services, I would be concerned as to why certain features are still missing, but it doesn’t seem to be the case and so therefore I am patient with the process.