That’s great to hear.
to see if they persist with re-syncing and what
I don’t feel the plugin right now has a good story for re-syncing. The plugin currently will skip modifying any book that was already sycned at least once before, even if there are new highlights.
I’ve gone with this simplistic approach as I am sure what is the desired behaviours that users would want. Should the plugin:
(a) auto-replace a book that has been previously synced before and had new highlights? this could result in data loss if that file has been modified
(b) should the plugin skip any books that have synced at least once before? that is the current behaviour. But it means you will not get your latest highlights without deleting your last file.
(c) should the plugin attempt to concatenate any new highlights at the end of the file? This could result in highlights being unordered
Keen to know your thoughts or anyone else’s for that matter on how you think re-sync should work?