I’m not really fond of adding another new syntax to Obsidian markdown. It’d be nice if this were done using either existing markdown syntax, e.g.:
| Field |
Value |
| Ran |
5km |
| In |
22:50 |
Or by accessing markdown content using headers or block IDs, e.g. taking this:
Related Links
- [[this]]
- [[that]]
- [[other]]
And accessing it as a “Related Links” field.
I would much rather see Obsidian support ways of:
- Configuring specific YAML fields to support links and tags
- Showing errors in YAML parsing in the editor
- Editing YAML without needing to know YAML syntax
These things would keep metadata more portable, as does using markdown headings. Creating new syntax means not just new parsing in Obsidian, but new parsing in every single plugin that has to deal with these new kinds of fields, and entire new classes of possible errors to sort out. As annoying as YAML can sometimes be, there at least already exist plenty of documents and tools for working with it. Anything new is just adding to the “now we have more standards” problem.
(And making delimiters configurable is even worse.)
I think the real root issue here isn’t YAML vs. body, it’s the fact that Obsidian doesn’t support updating links in the header, and doesn’t give you good feedback about the validity of your YAML. If those issues didn’t exist, there would be little reason to use the body instead of the front matter for this kind of data.