This was the initial message from the forum moderator.
Final thoughts…
Just imagine having your contribution here being reduced to ‘minimal’. How much effort you put in and… ‘minimal’. How would you react?
My ratio of links to external content exceeded some non-specific limit, … that is, “right now”… on an old post … all because I let people know that I was excited to share new ideas in the future.
If you look through my posts you’ll see they were relevant (topic: share and showcase), helpful, and well received (hearts). This is what they want to prevent?
Go read these articles and imagine copying over the images, gifs, code samples, examples, and lengthy but understandable explanations. Would it read well here? Would it reach a wide audience here? Should this material be kept away?
The core issue is placement: Medium.
Ban Medium, take a clear stance. “We want to prevent authors from investing their time to create and share useful content.” Imagine a world where people aren’t motivated to trade their free time to do what others want: is this world paradise or baren?
The argument is “access isn’t unlimited, people only get so much free stuff before they have to wait or subscribe”.
This is the actual argument. A completely free location is fine but one without limitless access is not.
As an aside: Obsidian is free, we wait for free stuff, or we pay to get it all now. … This is exactly the same model. It motivates contribution and contribution fuels innovation.
The forum moderator has made the rules known: “no mentions of own Medium posts near or abouts 40% regardless of relevance”. And some gleefully cheer, “yay, no more stuff.”
Those are my final thoughts. I don’t need the rules re-explained. I won’t keep the conversation going. I will just put my efforts elsewhere.
I’ve enjoyed my time here. I really enjoyed the challenge some of the problems you’ve posed have been. But it was a wake up call that what I’ve been doing isn’t wanted. So I’m moving on.