It’s not a issue of resolution. In every graphics editor, the brush feels different as a tool, and in my experience, I’ve noticed that in graphics editors for vector graphics, the brush feels particularly bad. Even if we take only graphic editors for raster graphics – Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint, Krita, Rebelle – the brush feels different in each of them.
And in the case of vector graphics, the bad behavior of the brush is often exacerbated by the presence of stabilization and post-correction, which is also very annoying.
There is no need to give up vector graphics – I am simply asking to consider supporting raster graphics for those users who would find it convenient.
And, by the way, in what cases could support for preserving image quality when scaling be useful? You initially create a canvas of the desired size, say, 6,000 x 4,000 pixels, and it is unlikely that you will ever need the image to be larger. And I’m talking about digital drawing and painting, not to mention note-taking, where the likelihood of this being useful is even lower, as you will be able to recognize the letters anyway.
Support for preserving image quality when scaling in vector graphics, compared to all its inconveniences and limited capabilities relative to raster graphics, is nothing at all. Personally for me, based on my experience working with graphics, my use cases, and my vision of how I plan to take handwritten notes and my priorities regarding the various aspects of this feature’s functionality.
I apologize if this sounds a little rude, but I find it difficult to express this thought in any other way.